Science and Creation
In this section:
The entire page must load
before use of the quick links
At first, it was said that evolution happens so slowly, we couldn't possibly observe it, or record it. As that theory got over thrown in various ways, evolutionists began to add more and more time to the theory, in order to increase its probability. They went from publishing the occurrence of the big bang at millions of years, to 100's of millions, and now it's into the billions, regardless of the fact that, the big bang itself, and every theoretical function from that point on, defy the mechanical laws of physics. They have strayed from science and entered a patchwork of unseen and unprovable theories, such as the inflation theory, dark matter, and dark energy. Each piece of patch work that they add in a desperate attempt to save their precious foundation of deep time, only creates even more impossible hurdles for themselves.
Eventually enough of them realized all of this is so unlikely to have happened by chance, that it is more likely for none of what we can see, hear, touch, smell or taste, should actually exist. Instead of admitting that there could be a designer, their next best option is that we are just a perceiver projecting our own reality. Things exist because we look at them. I can't even list how many problems that creates, but as you will see in the 3rd video of "What you aren't being told about astronomy" videos, this is the most current crock of imagination, that the deniers of science have come up with. It's called a "Boltzmann brain" if you'd like to see for yourself.
This wandering "science" (which it so isn't) is well funded, and being publicly accepted. As far as TV is concerned, they're just sticking with the billions of years thing and never able to successfully explain what would even support that. Unfortunately, we can't watch a documentary today without the video shoving millions of years of evolution at us.
Let's take a closer look at the origin of the theory itself, and examine the beginning of Darwin's "Theory of evolution". There are many detailed and evidence packed seminars, by the most outstanding people who have approached these topics head on, and with full honesty. Like myself, many of these people did not start off with a churchy agenda. We just wanted the truth. Let the data speak for itself, instead of imposing your agenda on what you want it to be. Instead of manipulating the data to support what you want.
"A bit of science distances one from God, but much science nears one to Him."
~ Louis Pasteur
The video titled, "What were the original animals God created really like? - Dr. Todd Wood", was made by the fantastic group called, Is Genesis History? In this video, they describe how fantastic the puzzle of genetic coding really is. They examine what exactly it is that causes animal kinds to change so much, in such a short period of time? For example, when we humans breed dog kinds to deliberately turn off unwanted characteristics in the dog's genes, and carry through the desired characteristics. What is exactly happening with its genetics?
The answer to that question is much more difficult, and much more complex, than most evolutionists would readily admit. This is still a massive frontier, and even though a lot has been discovered in the past twenty, and even ten years, we still don't fully understand how genetics function. We are even more ignorant to the functions of epigenetics, which is the word for the mechanisms that that handle all the coding, and not the coding itself.
As you will see in the video, with every animal kind we consider, all of the various available changes possible within that animal kind, are already there in the coding. In other words, any changes that happen within that kind, already have the instructions there in the coding, to fulfill any of the possible changes that can happen, within that animal kind. Those available genes are either activated, or switched off, to give that animal is unique design features. However, those available changes can only occur within the animal's own kind, and only with the coding that has always existed in that particular animal kind. These changes do not, and can not happen across animal kinds.
For more really thought provoking and interesting views, from many different creation scientists and doctors this website is absolutely a favorite.
It would seem that "Evolution" as it is generically referred to, is the first wall encountered when convincing someone that they are not a matter of chance, and that there is indeed a purpose to life. Whenever God, or the Bible is mentioned, the topic of "Evolution" will come up for obvious reasons. They blatantly do not get along, and yet macroevolution is taught in public schools to this day, and a creator no longer is. He has been removed. Believe it or not, it was very much the opposite before Darwin came along.
Evolution happens, yes it is definitely a thing. However, as made popular by Charles Darwin and his crew, they greatly theorized it into a whole other realm. Microevolution, not macroevolution, is seen observably happening today, and it has also been seen in the fossil record. Even against false claims, not one intermediate entity of macroevolution has ever been seen, or found. We have an enormous amount of fossils of every kind, from every layer. So where are all the transitional kinds, if they all came from each other? They will often just point to some animal's part, that they didn't quite understand yet and say, "Well this must be evolution happening." Even if it appears to be an absolute hinderance to them. Mutations are from a lack of information, information is not being added to what is already there.
This topic has an enormous amount of bias, coming from people who either hate the idea of a creator, or love the idea of a creator. It would seem the best way to observe something, is If you can come to a place where you really are willing to just do some honest science, whether it ends up landing on the God side of the fence, or the "Explosion from nothing" side of the fence. Isn't real science being willing to consider all of the data, and honestly? There is a lot of very interesting evidence, and forthright data presented throughout this section. Data that you can go see, and even test for yourself if you are willing to. You'll be amazed what you are not being told in schools, or on science documentaries. All you have to do is look.
''I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest that an artist should be used to visualize such transformations, but where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly, provide it, and if I were to leave it to artistic license, would that not mislead the reader?’'- Dr. Patterson, from "Darwin's Enigma"
Read more about it,
What were the Original Animals God Created Really Like? - Dr. Todd Wood 16:37
The Scientific Method was adopted by the scientific community as an attempt to remove human bias, and errors. The problem is however, humans are still the ones doing the science. This only works if those in charge are being honest with the data, with the control groups, with the testing methods, and with the numbers. If that is done correctly, then it will tell you if there any unknown variables missing, or if calculations for the preposed model are supported by the results of the test.
The steps of the scientific method are represented in this graph. It is the guiding line for anyone who decides to commit themselves to testing a thought, or a hypothesis. They should follow it as accurately and strictly as possible, so as to ensure the trueness of the results. As all things are, it too is susceptible to corruption just as it stands. You can apply dishonest tactics, or false readings into the experiment, such as saying certain variables are linear, when in reality they are actually quite dynamic. In addition to that, then add in the fact that there is an established scientific community who holds the power, and can control the set ideals and also the funding. If your report isn't published through their means of publications, such as in their scientific journals, then it isn't legitimatized. If they don't like what you're saying, then you will never have a name, or a place in their fraternity.
There is indeed a scientific family and an established hierarchy. If you do not abide to their terms and concepts, you will be excommunicated, and defunded with no chance of returning. Many know all too well how true that is, because they have experienced it first hand. However, It isn't as secret as they would like it to be. You will see later with Ben Stein's video. For now, the following videos titled "What is Science", are a wonderful set of videos put together by Professor and Ph.D Philip Stott. A man with a very impressive list of credentials and experience in the scientific community. These are just the first two of his series of videos on youtube, but each video is another thick layer of knowledge. This is a link for more about him.
1 | What is science? 7:40
2 | What is science? (Continued) 5:43
The Most Important Documentary
You Could EVER Watch,
Exposing Darwin's Evolution
"Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (full movie)" 1:37:59
If the information in that video is new to you, than you're bound to have a lot of questions. I did my best to answer every single good question I've had, or have ever been asked, from this point on. God is REAL, there is a purpose to life, none of this was an accident, and neither are you.
"Bill Nye VS Kent Hovind - Short Creation Debate" 14:39
"Information Enigma: Where does
information come from?" 21:00
"The Fossil Record:Proof of Noah's Flood
or Evolution" 16:00
"Are Mutations really the Driving Force behind Darwinian Evolution? - Dr. Kevin Anderson" 19:43
"Answers in Genesis - 4 Power Questions
for Evolutionists" 49:57
The full title to Charles Darwin's book:
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection,
or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life
This theory has been blasted wide open, as out right wrong, even in the eyes of agnostic sects. If you are of native African heritage, and have dark skin, just remember he thought of you as a intermediate species, slowing down the pack. I don't think even the most left winged celebrities can get on board with that statement.
If anyone actually reads "The Origin of Species", they would likely be shocked to learn that among Darwin's scientifically based proposals, was the elimination of "The negro and native Australian peoples", which he considered savage races, whose continued survival was hindering the progress of civilization.
In his next book, The Descent of Man (1871), Darwin ranked races in terms of what he believed was their nearness and likeness to gorillas. Then he went on to propose the extermination of races he "scientifically" defined as inferior. If this were not done, he claimed, those races with much higher birthrates than "superior" races, would exhaust the resources needed for the survival of better people, eventually dragging down all civilization. Now I'll agree, people in general, are definitely becoming less intelligent, but that is another argument altogether, and has nothing to do with genetics.
Even with the amazing systems that had to be in place before the chicken or the egg, genetics and DNA are only getting worse, and not better. Ask any geneticist about it, and they will agree with the second law of thermodynamics, which states that all things tend to disorder. That is even very easy to see for yourself.
Darwin argued that advanced societies should not waste time and money on caring for the mentally ill, or those with birth defects. To him, these unfit members of our kind, ought not to survive.
Aside from all those Hitler like perspectives, there are several foundational pillars that must be in place for the overall theory to work. If any one of them collapses, the entire theory can not stand. Since his time when he thought the cell was the most rudimentary and simple building block of life, these foundational pillars have been utterly obliterated.
This can be easily understood with a basic grasp of cause and effect. Just take some time and have a look at the 17 arguments made here.
Top Ten Biological, and Chemical issues.
These following links are about what was said to be one of the earliest known "links" in the chain of evolution. It has what they called "Primitive biological systems" in the evolutionary chain. It was found as a fossil, and it was said to be 70 million years old. However, It was found in 1938 still living, and completely unchanged. Do you understand what that means? "Evolution" as it was being sold. Never. Occurred. Look at the evidence yourself. There are many examples like this, and we haven't even spoken about how the trilobites found in the deepest layers of earth, and thought to be one of the oldest, have the most advanced category of eyes on the planet, compound eyes. With just those few facts, Darwin's theory is starting to fall apart in a massive way.
This isn't remotely close to the only species found as an example to support creation and destroy evolutionary links either, there are many more, as you will see later presented by Dr. Stephen Meyer.
Any one of these examples is detrimental to the theory of happenstance, I mean evolution. Yet, they don't want "God", so accident it is.
Here is a list of other animals, that not only go against evolution, they prove creation.
Do you believe in Unicorns?
God brought them out of Egypt; he hath as it were the strength of an unicorn.
His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.
Save me from the lion's mouth: for thou hast heard me from the horns of the unicorns.
Canst thou bind the unicorn with his band in the furrow? or will he harrow the valleys after thee?
Also found in
Isaiah 34:7, Psalms 29:6, Psalms 92:10
"Why Does The Bible Mention Unicorns" 8:09
You definitely need to be ready for this topic, as it is a favorite wild card amongst evolutionists to toss in, when the debate begins to turn against them. "What about where the Bible mentions Unicorns? Do you believe in unicorns?" The Bible clearly states Unicorn, does it not?
If you're not ready for that, it can really unhinge you. With a quick visit in the original languages, is very easy to see that it was referring to a species of rhinoceros. People today don't often speak latin, or understand binomial nomenclature. When they hear the word unicorn, they laugh and think of the mythical flying horse creature, not a single horned rhinoceros . If you look up the Latin translation derived from the original Hebrew or Greek translation, it is easy to see that it's writing of the "Uni-horned Rhino".
This video explains it all very well, and it's just something that is worth mentioning, and requires some clarification these days. The one horned rhino known as the Elasmotherium sibiricum, is a very likely candidate for what the Bible was referring to. It certainly was a force to be reckoned with, suitable for the analogies it was used in.
"TRILOGY OF LIFE - Prehistoric Park -
"Unicorn" (Elasmotherium sibiricum)" 2:12
Though there are many time keepers in the universe for us to observe, and to study the decay rates of, it should only take a few solid examples that do not support the hypothesis, to cause the scientist to go back to the top of the scientific method, and get back to the drawing board. Except we don't just have a few examples, there are hundreds of examples that do not support the amount of time Darwin's evolution wishes it had to pull off what isn't actually possible regardless of time. Go examine as many as you want.
Here is a list of 101 more of them, if you'd like to check them out.
Top 10 Evidences For a Young Earth
"5 Evidences The Earth Is
Less Than 10,000 Years Old" 8:17
The Lunar Laser Ranging experiment Apollo missions 11, 14, and 15, the crews left retroreflectors on the surface of the Moon. These are a series of small concave, half cube mirror reflectors, that always return a laser beam back to its origin, on principle of physics. Visit this link to learn more.
The entire purpose of this was to accurately (to the millimeter) observe the moon's orbit, and distance. After monitoring the Moon's orbit for over 50 years now, they have learned it's traveling away from Earth at a rate of 3.8cm, or 1.5 inches a year. They admit that figure is "Anomalous", and it would be, if there weren't 100's if not 1000's of other examples that are also anomalous to the what they are trying to believe. I suppose an evolutionist would just ignore this, and move on...
For those of us with an open mind, and who are willing to read the cards as they lie, the obvious data makes perfect sense compared with everything else we find. The Earth is much younger than they teach. For this example, I have kept the math linear, even though in reality the effects are much greater, as I will explain. It is a very easy one to calculate and understand why this refutes the belief of such an old Earth. Especially, when you consider the Moon is the major factor that raises and lowers the tides.
We can easily calculate how much the Moon's distance to Earth effects our tide to the foot by comparing the current highest possible tide, and the lowest possible tide for any given year. We use the closest the Moon gets to Earth in orbit, with the farthest it gets. Then we can add back the years at the rate of 1.5 inches a year, and see just how high the tides would have been. As I said, I have kept this calculation linear for simplicity, but the real results are actually quadrupled. In addition to that and for even more accuracy, you would also need to factor in how much stronger the suns gravity would be if we added back all the mass it has used as fuel and burned up over time.
Highest perigee & perihelion tide
with the moon at a closest distance of
Lowest apogee & aphelion tide
with the moon at a farthest distance of
Difference of perigee and apogee
Range of tide
30,564 /9.2 = 3322.174
So about every 3,322.174ft =
1 foot in tidal height
The average moon travel
away from the Earth
is calculated to be
1.5 in per year
by NASA since 1969
1.5 x 100,000 years =
150,000in / 12 = 12,500ft
12,500 / 3322.174 = 3.76 ft
So every 100,000 years = 3.76 feet
1 million years = 37.6 feet high
2 million = 75.2ft
5 million = 188ft
10 million = 376ft
100 million years = 3,760 feet high
1 billion years = 37,600 feet high,
or 7 miles high.
Long before the tides got that drastically detrimental to life on Earth, the Moon would have crashed into it. The two planetary bodies would have reached what is known as the "Roche limit" at around 9,500km apart. The Roche limit is the exact distance at which two large bodies get close enough to each other, where the forces that pull them together, become greater than the gravitational forces that hold the individual bodies of mass together. At this limit the begin to break apart as they smash into each other and then become one large body of mass.
Even at 1 million years, a tidal wave that high and frequent would have been a terrible thing. The 2010 tsunami of Japan was very big at 128 feet, and just look what it did. Now let's consider the 10 million year mark. Even evolutionists have been backed into a corner to admit that the probability of evolution being a sound theory is impossible without at least a billion years. At 10 million years the tides would swing 376 feet which would devastate the planet. Just to throw another wrench in there, evolutionist say the Moon came from the Earth, which is spinning incredibly fast at 1000mph at the surface, and it's also on a 23.5 degree tilt of rotation, so due to the law of conservation of angular moment, the moon should also be spinning and on the same axial tilt. However, as another wonder of God we call a "Tidal lock", the same face of the moon is always looking back at us.
In addition to all this math done, as I said it in order to keep it simple it was done as if it was a linear effect, but it isn't. The tidal attraction to the Sun and Moon's mass would be hyperbolic, just like 2 magnets as they get closer. The effect would actually be about 4 times stronger with every bisection. This is due to the "Inverse square law", meaning all those figures are grossly understated. It would actually be much worse. Just go back to the math and "quadruple" each "Foot high" result, to get the real answer.
Now, if you think to yourself "Perhaps the rate at which the moon is traveling away from Earth, is increasing in distance as time goes on?" The answer to that, is that it is actually incredibly consistent, but you are correct. It is true to say that it is not a constant, but the variation is actually decreasing its rate of separation in distance as time goes on. That means it is slowing down over time, adding yet another layer to confirm a young Earth, and confound the evolutionist's agenda.
The more I study science, the more I believe in God.
~ Albert Einstein
Our Sun, is a running engine. It's mass is made out of it's own fuel. As she burns it gets used, thereby decreasing its mass. This is all measurable from here. To say it remains unchanged, is really something unreasonable.
Gravity is extremely consistent, and the matter of which the sun is comprised of, is quite uniform. The burn rate of the fusion process is consistent, and it is located in a very stabile environment, (the vacuum of space). According to NASA, It rips through 600 million tons of hydrogen per second, and resets its solar cycle every eleven years or so. With all of that in mind, let's consider a couple of the statements from their website.
''The Sun consumes about 600 million tons of hydrogen per second. That's 6 x 10 to the 8th power, tons. For comparison, the mass of the Earth is about 1.35 x 10 to the 21st power tons. This would mean the Sun consumes the mass of the Earth in about 70,000 years. ~Dr. Louis Barbier - (NASA)
"It is incorrect to say that the Sun is shrinking and it has been since the "creation" of the Universe. The Sun is not shrinking at a consistent rate. The data that were used to derive that were both wrong and misinterpreted. See the Skeptic Friends Network. Dr. Eric Christian
Go to the next link below this to find, and click on that "skeptic Friends" links. you have to see their response for yourself.
Then about the solar cycle he says this:
The periodicity of the eleven year solar cycle is complicated by the fact that there is no well-timed event that you can actually use as a basis for your periodicity. However, the Sun is much more regular than the "Seven to eighteen year range" that you mention. You can look at this image to see the best long term measure of solar activity (the sun spot number). There are modern observations that give a better measure of solar variability, but we've only got data for two or three cycles worth. The actual long term period is slightly more than eleven years and is remarkably stable. There are scientists who look at the statistics of solar activity and may have found other periodicities, but for the general public, there is effectively no difference between eleven and twelve years, especially given the broad and irregular temporal structure of both solar min and solar max.
Dr. Eric Christian (October 2003)
This is all on their website!
So NASA is saying, In a surprisingly consistent manner it burns up six hundred million tons of hydrogen (which has mass, as matter does) per second, in an energy transfer from a gas through a fusion burning process, and converts and expels the matter into heat and light energy, thereby removing the matter it has, and it does this at a surprisingly constant rate, but isn't "shrinking" at a constant rate... Really? How many laws of physics does that break?
Even if the pull of gravity decreased at just the right rate, so that its diameter expanded in direct proportion to the fuel it burnt, and it's diameter remained roughly the same, over the span of even one million years, gravity would still decrease significantly, because it has been burning it's own mass. Gravity, is very important to our orbit, and orbit is very important to our seasons and temperature. That is also true about the perfect balance of heat delivered, the ellipsis of the orbit, the twenty three and a half degree tilt of the earth's rotation, which gives us seasons. This is the same for the moon which provides the tides to pump our oceans, and the weather systems to create the storms that shield the sun even more. Which in turn provides the nitrogen and rain for our soil to feed the plants, and that allows them to give off oxygen, and allows the mammals to breathe, and in return exhale the carbon dioxide for the plant's photosynthesis. All of this could not exist if the sun wasn't just right.
Even with all of that considered, and only the variable of gravity was changed by that much. It still would not allow for life on earth. Not to even mention the magnetic protection, chemical, or any of the other thousands, and thousands of other variables that need to be in place for us to survive. It could not work if just that one thing were changed, by only one million years at a constant burn rate of six hundred million tons per second.
The fact is, that it's being used up, and therefore it's features are decreasing, not remaining completely unchanged from an unlimited supply of energy from nowhere. At some point you have to admit that our very existence as we know it, to be happenstance from and explosion of NOTHING is absolutely absurd! The sooner you can admit this is ridiculous, the sooner you will realize the existence of a grand designer makes WAY more sense. The next step is finding out if this creator has left us any way of knowing him. I was shocked to find that there is only one so called religion that not only holds water, it has an enormous amount of support evidentially, literally, and philosophically. It even proves it's divine authorship by its written details and much more. The good news is that these days, it isn't that difficult to verify, much of the research has been done, and all you have to do is go look. Fortunately, you came to the right website, and a lot of it is here waiting for you.
That is up to each of us to decide based on research, and fueled by the guarantee that we will one day die. So if there is a designer of all this, then what is the point? Why are we here? Faith was never meant to be blind, and I can assure you, there some very solid answers for you if you seek them.
Here is a bunch of work, data, and even charts complied found on the sun.
There is math all over the universe, with whatever calculations you want to perform to show that the law's of thermodynamics are at work. You will find that energy does dissipate, and it can be measured and added back against time. Doing this with millions of years will give you staggeringly large, and very impossible results to support these evolutionary theories to our existence, as we know it. This math shouts that creation is very young, and people are just trying to find a way to say it doesn't, so that they can be their own God and do as they please, turning a blind eye to their own temporal and futile existence. You will leave this world with as much control as you had when you came into it, so it would be wise to humble yourself and seek out your maker.
It is amazing that some who are accustomed to these fields still have the deliberate nerve to search for anything that disproves a creator, and can actually ignore the glaring data because they either don't want God, or don't want to be ostracized by their peers. Evolution is indeed a religion, and it requires defiance, bullying, or a lack of understanding to just accept what is handed to you, and just as I say to anyone in a cult belief. THINK FOR YOURSELF, go crunch some numbers and search the nitty gritty, as well as the beginnings to these ideas. The beginning is the foundation of any belief, and it will determine the strength of the entire house.
Some more unavoidable math.
A good way to make a point is to hyperbolize; to exaggerate the scenario, so as to better reveal the degree of its effects. This is done for us when it comes to studying the largeness of creation, with the expanse of space, or the smallest forms of life, with microbiology. In doing this we should eventually come to a point where we realize that, we couldn’t possibly explain how anything began. Not only is it irreducibly complex, and also has a definite beginning, but where did it come from?
In that moment, you should realize it isn't just because we don’t understand. It's safe to say, we will never make a galaxy, or even build a single celled organism into motion, even if we robbed Peter to pay Paul! We are not in charge of existence, and we were put here. Nothing in this incomprehensibly large space, or these unbelievably small atomic structures found in this precise universe was a matter of chance, at all. So who is in charge, and how do we know that?
Life is NOT an accident, and we do NOT exist without meaning or purpose. There are glaring facts of things that exist, that could not exist if the beginning was not so long ago. The rate of decay is far too quick for the features of any given astronomical body, but as evolutionists state, Darwin's theories make no sense without trillions and trillions of years.
Consider how every single explanation from evolutionists on how stars form, require other stars to already exist! A cosmic chicken and the egg scenario. Not to mention we have never seen a star form, they just point to gassy nebulas where we cant see inside of, and say it happens there of course. They have tried to sell the theory of “Dark matter” and “Dark energy”, but even that is too far of a stretch for mainstream astrophysicists to buy. These videos by Spike Psarris are the best videos I have ever seen produced. They're available for purchase in very high definition at:
From Atheist to Creationist
Astrophysicist Spike Psarris' Amazing testimony
"What You Aren't Being Told About Astronomy
- Vol I (Our Created Solar system)" 1:50:59
"What You Aren't Being Told About Astronomy
- Vol II (Our Created Stars and Galaxies)" 1:03:05
"What You Aren't Being Told About Astronomy
- Vol III (Our Created Universe)" 1:47:39
How can we see stars so far away?
"Distant Starlight Vs. The Biblical Timeline.
(The Short Version)" 13:47
"(Undebunkable) Cosmic Microwave Background Proves Intelligent Design - but by whom?" 10:07
"Distant Starlight: Does It Disprove Biblical Creation?
(The In-Depth Version)" 1:18:15
"The horizon problem - why does the universe look the same in all directions" 2:37
The Grand Canyon is often used by evolutionists as a shining example of the layers of Earth's timeline. They claim that the Colorado river has cut through the land over millions of years. If you take a walk on any of the trails around the canyon, you will see little brass placards in the sidewalk stating the various hundreds of millions of years where you are standing. Real quickly I'd like to point out a major feature that blows this theory apart. It is a feature they never seem to point out, and it certainly doesn't have its own brass sign.
The Colorado originates in the Rocky Mountains and flows into the pacific. That is to say, from right to left in the picture shown. Please take a moment to realize that according to their theory, that this means the mighty Colorado River was mighty enough to flow uphill over a length of nearly three hundred miles, for thousands of vertical feet, right through the mountain that is in the way, oh and also flow uphill for millions of years to allow this to happen.
Obviously, the mountain was there before the river, because the entire Rocky Mountain range is still there, and yet there is a river running through it. I have to hear an evolutionist give a valid explanation as to how a river can climb over a mountain range and cut through it. I'm sure we can all be grateful that the rivers of today don't behave like that!
It's facts like these, that make most creation scientist speakers all irritated about it when they speak. Just try not to get bothered when they get snippy, but it is very frustrating when you know this stuff is not being acknowledged and it's everywhere. It makes you wonder what in the world is going on around here? Why don't people see all of this, or say anything about it?! We will get into that on another page, but as for the rest of this section, we won't just be scratching the surface on these topics any more, these vast lengths of time evolutionists need, are about to get completely obliterated in detail.
"The Hydroplate Theory
The Flood (Newer Version)" 10:53
"Geological Evidence for the Worldwide Flood. Dr. Andrew Snelling. Origins. Creation Evidence." 24:24
A Young Earth and The "Hydroplate Theory"
Doctors Kent Hovind and Walt Brown have done more work on these topics then is ever needed to irrefutably convince anybody that the "Evolution Theory" is a bad theory. The points made by these men are numerous and they are sound. It will have you wondering how Charles Darwin ever got a foothold in the first place, but as they say, "You don't know, what you don't know, and if you tell a lie long enough and loud enough people will believe it."
Dr. Walt Brown's website where his incredibly detailed and very full book may be read online, or purchased.
These men; Dr. Kent Hovind, Dr. Grady McMurtry, and Dr. Andrew Snelling all have a series of youtube seminars on nearly every question you can think of, and then some. These videos give reference to the sources and methods used, and they're delivered section by section pain free to you. All you have to do is watch them, listen, and consider it. Your only effort is to set the time aside to sit down and watch them, but it is absolutely well worth it. Below are the first videos of their respective series. These are so info packed, and viable. I'd truly be amazed if you watch all of these to the end and still thought that this Earth is millions of years old, so buckle up.
"The Kent Hovind Creation Seminar (1 of 7) :
The Age of The Earth" 1:55:56
"The Garden of Eden" (2 of 7)
"Dinosaurs and the Bible" (3 of 7)
"Lies In The Textbooks" (4 of 7)
"The Dangers of Evolution" (5 of 7)
"25 Proofs Earth is Young - Dr. Grady McMurty
- 6000 Years Old?" 1:13:50
Dinosaurs and The Global Flood
"Does the Bible (Job 40) Describe
a Sauropod Dinosaur (Behemoth)?" 20:40
The K-PG Boundary and Dinosaur Extinction (aka "K-T Boundary") 5:56
"Carbon14 in Coal and Diamonds Debunks Darwin’s Long Ages. Dr. Vardiman - Origins. Creation Evidence" 5:49
Here is a significant problem for evolutionists. Carbon 14 has been found inside of diamonds. It isn't supposed to be inside of inorganic matter such as minerals that supposedly take millions of years to form. Carbon 14 is a radioactive isotope that has a half life of 5730 years, and as it degrades it turns into Nitrogen 14. As soon as something dies it stops making carbon 14, and from that point on it only decays and converts into Nitrogen 14. Hence the way they figure somethings age is by mathematically processing the ratio of nitrogen 14, to carbon 14.
I'm sure you are aware that diamonds are quite hard/dense, they don't allow for anything organic to just seep in and impregnate the diamond. There are 3 major factors required for diamond formation; Carbon, pressure, and time. Since evolutionists use time (or random meteors) to solve all their problems, they say diamonds take millions and millions of years to form. They don't believe such pressures, like that of "The flood", ever existed to form a diamond quickly. Even though there is a crazy amount of evidence to account for a global flood, and there is Carbon 14 inside of diamonds. We have since been able to create diamonds in minutes with the pressures that technology has allowed us to achieve.
Diamonds, a Creationist's best friend
Rare Mineral Ringwoodite Included within Diamond
Points to ‘Oceans’ beneath Earth
Speaking of oceans, this is a VERY interesting find. Ringwoodite is very rare, and it forms under extremely high pressures with water present. They have found Ringwoodite inside of a diamond, and the implications of this are that there must have been, at least at at one point, a massive amount of water deep within the Earth.
The "Hydroplate theory" isn't looking too bad at all with finds like this. Read all about it.
"Can you GROW an Opal?" 26:15
Just like diamonds, opals have also been indistinguishably reproduced by an Australian Opal Miner who happens to be a believer in the Bible. Len Cram did not accept the current theory for opal growth. He believed it happened much faster. He tested, and even perfected his theory, he was able to make opals in a matter of months.
Growing opals Australian style
This picture and link, shows a bug stuck inside opal. Evolutionists badly need opals to take millions of years, so they say it must have been amber first, but eh, it's um, it's only silica based opal... So, go fish.
Fossilization, petrification, opalization, those processes happen, and are scientifically feasible. Alchemy does not, so amber/silica can not magically change from one element to another, and that is not what is happening with any of those other processes either.
There is a list posted called "RSR's List of Not So Old Things", and on this list they go into opals and many other very interesting death blows to the theory of evolution.
Petrified Polystrate Fossils
Evolutionists prefer not to comment on all of these areas where huge amounts of species that do not live remotely close together, have died together. Fossils in many cases are of sea creatures found at high altitudes and far away from any type of sea, or as shown in the picture above, where "Polystrate" fossils are found petrified with, through, and amongst these so called layers of time.
If evolutionists do speak about them, they are each usually explained as a localized event. Just don't point out that these massive layers of a "localized events", all span huge regions of unbroken broken layers covering the entire planet, with fossilizing creatures that should not be where they are found.
Also, if these are indeed layers of time nothing should be able to traverse between the layers without some signs of any kind of erosion affecting the part of the object sticking up, before the next layer became a layer! These objects certainly could not have been shoved deep down into place, especially not entire trees, complete with roots.
Many of these creature's bodies, shells, or trees got washed far and wide. All of them settling somewhere, and usually in very large piles or groups of other various drowned things, as seen on the Utah/Colorado border, "The Wall of Bones". That is just one example of many, found all over Earth.
The picture above was taken from a beautiful and very comprehensive website, full of example and topics along these lines. It is well worth going to that site for more on geologic topics like these.
Uprooted and relocated, petrified trees
"Yellowstone Removes Misleading Petrified Tree Sign; Trees Grew Elsewhere" 3:29
These are the layers laid down throughout time, as proposed by Darwin. There have been countless examples to overthrow this theory since he first proposed it. Many are devastating to the theory of evolution, so anyone who would like to keep their jobs in the science or educational fields had better keep their mouths shut about all of them.
This is another wonderful website that this photo is from, and it also shines light on many of the very valid points that go against this theory of layers in time.
This is another amazing video that goes along with the, "impossible to be an accident" category such as the series of "Sevens" Ivan Panin found shown on the" History of The Writings" page. Or also, the discovery of the meanings of each name from the lineage from Adam to Jesus, that tell the story of Jesus, over the huge span of time these names were given.
In Revelation 21, there is another very interesting feature about the specific list of gemstones used for the foundation in Heaven. At first mention, that list doesn't really seem to be hiding something amazing, unless you know what is special about these stones that have been chosen out of all of them.
Only recently has our science reached an advanced enough level, to give us the ability to know what is special about the amazing relationship these particular 12 stones have with pure light. This list is more specific than you think.
"The Precious Stones of Revelation 21" 5:49
Carbon dating! If there is anything more obnoxious to hear from an evolutionists, it's this, "But we know how old it is, because we've carbon dated it". If you're being serious with that statement, you're not using science, because you're ignoring a major factor to suit the results you want. The measure of carbon in a thing is accurate, yes, but the amount of carbon a thing should have over time and events, is completely unknown! There are so many unknown variables that add can add carbon to anything, dead or alive. Unless it's as hard as a diamond. That, is the very obvious truth. Look up what scientists dated the logs that got blown into the lake at Mt. St. Helens to, and we know exactly when that happened. Example after example of the glaring data is just being ignored!
The truth is that we do know the half life of various radioactive isotopes and a few other means of dating, and we can accurately measure how much Carbon and Nitrogen an object has, but we have absolutely know way of knowing how much Carbon any given thing should have, unless it's organic, and its environment is abnormally isolated. Watch these videos and you will see all about it.
"Does Carbon Dating Go Beyond Biblical History?" 5:18
"Helium Diffusion Rates and the Age of the Earth. Dr. Vardiman - Origins. Creation Evidence." 23:53
"Ice Rings Are Not Annual Layers - Kent Hovind" 12:28
"Radiometric Dating Debunked In 3 Minutes." 3:05
"Radiohalos: Evidence of Accelerated Radioactive Decay - Dr. Andrew Snelling" 1:02:59
"The Ice Age - Only The Bible Can Explain it! Michael Oard. Meteorologist. Creation Evidence." 1:11:17
What Really Caused the Ice Age and Climate Change? - Dr. Larry Vardiman 20:26
Take the time to think about the precise function and purpose in the grand design of any bit of creation. From the smallest working functions of matter, to the largest. It is amazing to me that there are extremely intelligent people who are willing to say we just came about from a violent explosion from nothing, into the hostile environment of space, and all these insanely complex mechanics, (we still don't understand much of) all just came together by chance.
Whether it be quarks, or atoms, mitochondria, or the cell, the inner ear, or our organs, our endocrine system, or the central nervous system, or all the food chain and chemical relationship with our environment, to the planets and the solar system, or the Galaxy, and even all the entire universe, each and every part of this world are interlinking complex functioning factories, within a factory, in a factory, in a factory, and on and on...
How many explosions from nothing, of matter which supposedly didn’t exist prior to the explosion, would it take to make EVEN ONE function of just one factory work? Much less the unfathomable amount of irreducibly complex self replicating ones?
If it's not wanting to have God to answer to, then it's either the fear of being excommunicated by the proud mainstream, or because scientists see themselves as the ones who are paid to deliver a Godless explanation. They feel as though admitting we have been made by God, is a bit like admitting "magic", and that means they don't understand. They are therefore an inferior scientist who couldn't find an answer. However, the scientific data is all very much so there, and it's not doing their desires any favors. They have to deliberately ignore the scientific method to enforce their agenda.
People don't like the idea of being told what to do, even if it is for our own good. People like to think they can be their own God. Even though, it should occur to them, we will all die, and none of us know the way from there. Unless they're convinced death is the utmost end, and life has absolutely no purpose. I wish I could convince them all, they are more important than they think they are, and there is indeed a purpose.
This next fellow is special and rare, he was an evolutionist, who was an honest and brave scientist. As a scientist should do, he observed the data without imposing a bias, and he let the data represent itself, instead of force fitting it into an established belief system.
"German Scientist, Günter Bechly,
Speaks Out About Intelligent Design" 6:03
"Protein synthesis animation" 19:12
"DNA - God's Amazing Programming, Evidence for His Existence" 4:24
"DNA Replication" 5:43
"DNA Damage and Repair" 5:00
"Hearing & Balance: Crash Course A&P #17" 10:39
"Vision: Crash Course A&P #18" 9:38
"Bacterial Flagellum -
A Sheer Wonder of Intelligent Design" 7:37
"Inner Life of the Cell (Full Version - Narrated)" 7:57
"Your Body's Amazing Molecular Machines" 6:20
"Electron Transport Chain" 7:44
"Taste & Smell: Crash Course A&P #16" 10:29
"Human Hearing System Explained" 3:20
"Be Grateful for the Intelligent Design of Your Eyes" 9:20
The youtube channel "Crash Course" has done a video on pretty much every topic regarding anatomy, physiology, and a whole lot more. If there are more systems you'd like to learn more about, I highly recommend using this resource.
This channel never mentions God, and only talks about the amazing function and design of various systems. Let the subjects declare what they may, and let the evolutionists tell you how they believe these systems defied the laws of thermodynamics, created their own blueprints, and designed themselves up through a chemically caustic and hostile environment through billions of years.
All of creation speaks for itself and declares the glory of the Lord, shouting all things have been intelligently designed, and are irreducibly complex. If one piece of any rung of the structure is missing, then there is no structure because the system can't work without it. It boggles the mind that this debate even exists.
Crash Course Anatomy and Physiology Playlist
Consider the Kestrel hunting, shown in the video above. It holds it's head in the same respective position to it's target, so it can focus on what it's looking at. Every system must be working together in order to achieve this ability, and every part of each separate system must work for that system to function alone. In order for the Kestrel to do this, it would be using each of these following systems simultaneously; the eye, inner ear, nervous system and central nervous system, pulmonary system, cardiovascular system, muscular systems, skeletal, and metabolic. It is true to say that it needs even more than that to maintain it's life and all those systems need to be self healing should any of them sustain minor damages. However, sticking to the immediate topic at hand, just consider how these systems work and what role each of them play as the bird does this everyday task.
The next two videos will also shine light on how special their feather and bone structures are. They're both done by Dr. David Menton. The first video focuses on the amazing features, and major differences between bird skin, and reptile skin. It highlights how incredibly different the two are, and how the skin alone is an unthinkable barrier to overcome in the transition, if birds could somehow have evolved from dinosaurs. The second video talks about the differences in the skeletal structures between the two, which are also incredibly different in more ways than most realize.
Every video thereafter reveals the amazing design and complexity of some of the most amazing creatures. After watching these videos surely we can say with full certainty,
For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood from His workmanship, so that men are without excuse.
"Formed to Fly - Feathers From Scales Impossibility. Dr. David Menton. Origins. Creation Evidence." 23:18
"Metamorphosis: The Beauty & Design of Butterflies" 4:22
"Monarch Butterflies: Great Migration" 4:36
"The Orchid Bee": From One Planet
- "Our Planet" on Netflix" 2:16
"Living Gears | Today's Creation Moment" 2:01
"Formed to Fly" 11:37
"THIS IS A BUTTERFLY! (Scanning Electron Microscope) - Part 2 - Smarter Every Day 105" 9:18
"The Large Blue Butterfly Adopted By Ants | BBC Earth" 2:25
"Stick, Snake or caterpillar?" 1:04
"Indisches Blatt (Indian Leaf)" 2:01
"Mathematics in Nature Proves Intelligent Design. Creation Evidence." 6:23
"In What Ways Does the Creation Display God's Handiwork? - Dr. Stuart Burgess" 21:46
"Amazing Process of Photosynthesis" 4:54
"Wonder of Water" 8:06
"Wonder of Light" 2:47
"Astronomy - Ch. 9.1: Earth's Atmosphere (6 of 61) Atmospheric Temperature Gradient" 7:49
The absolute precision of our existence, and innumerable symbiotic relationships from atomic levels, up to cosmic, be it chemical, physical, or biological, are all so overwhelmingly dialed to perfection, by themselves and even more so altogether, are all allowing us to take a breath in relative peace compared to the harsh extremes of space. We should not be here, not at all by a way of chance.
This information is endless, so by all means, look for it, seek it out. It is no wonder God said, "Seek, and Ye shall find". It is all right there in front of us, and is being exposed more every year. Yet so many have their proud minds made up, but have no viable reason to present why. For what? Because it is taught in schools? Because they want to be meaningless? Remove your opinion for a moment and then look at the facts. Turns out, you're actually important and loved, and there is a purpose to life! Isn't that fantastic news?! Darn right it is!
"Jonathan Wells Presents His Book Zombie Science" 53:09
"Grady McMurtry's "Evolution No Evidence", Part 1 of 4" 14:48
How to get ETERNAL LIFE
according to the Bible
Believe in your heart Jesus is The Lord, and that God raised him from the dead.
Declare it with your mouth, and you will be saved.
If you believe Jesus is your savior, be thankful! We're going home to place where 1 Corinthians 2:9 happens!
If you aren't quite sure Jesus is your savior, put your heart out on a limb. Nobody even needs to know you said it, God knows. It doesn't cost you anything, it is very easy, the reward is eternal life, just take a moment to believe,
Jesus is who he said he is.
Even if nothing happened, you are still in the same place you were before. The risk vs. reward here is an easy decision.
John 3: 12-21
If I have told you earthly things, and you believe not, how shall you believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? And no man has ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man who is in heaven. And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: That whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life. For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believes on him is not condemned: but he that believes not is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone that does evil hates the light, neither comes to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. But he that does truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are worked in God.
Acts 11: 16-18
Then I remembered what the Lord had said: ‘John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.’ So if God gave them the same gift he gave us who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I to think that I could stand in God’s way?” When they heard this, they had no further objections and praised God, saying, “So then, even to Gentiles God has granted repentance that leads to life.”
While Apollos was at Corinth, Paul took the road through the interior and arrived at Ephesus. There he found some disciples and asked them, “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?”
They answered, “No, we have not even heard that there is a Holy Spirit.”
So Paul asked, “Then what baptism did you receive?”
“John’s baptism,” they replied.
Paul said, “John’s baptism was a baptism of repentance. He told the people to believe in the one coming after him, that is, in Jesus.” On hearing this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.
If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved.
For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.
And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory.
“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.”
What is the will of The Father?
“And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day. For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.”