Science and Creation
“I myself am convinced that the theory of evolution, especially to the extent to which it has been applied, will be one of the greatest jokes in the history books of the future. Posterity will marvel that so very flimsy and dubious an hypothesis could be accepted with the incredible credulity it has.” ― Malcolm Muggeridge
It would seem that "Evolution" as it is generically referred to, is the first wall encountered in convincing someone that they are not a matter of chance, and that there is indeed a purpose to life. Whenever God, or the Bible is mentioned, the topic of "Evolution" will come up for obvious reasons. They blatantly do not get along, and yet Macro-evolution is taught in public schools to this day, and God no longer is. He has been removed. Believe it or not, it was very much the opposite before Darwin came along.
Evolution happens, yes it is definitely a thing. However, as made popular by Charles Darwin and his crew, they greatly theorized it into a whole other realm. MICROevolution, not MACROevolution, is seen observably happening today, and has been seen in the fossil record as well. However, even against false claims, not one intermediate entity of MACRO evolution has ever been seen, or found. But before you go believing a thing like that, you need to see some very forthright data, which is presented throughout this section.
At first, it was written, that evolution happens so slowly that we couldn't possibly observe it, or record it. As that theory got over thrown in various ways, evolutionists began to add time to the theory to increase its probability. They went from publishing the occurrence of the big bang at millions of years, to 100's of millions, and now it's into the billions. However, even the big bang has been scientifically proven to be impossible, they needed to add an unseen and unprovable thing, called dark matter, then also dark energy. However, that made the big bang even more impossible so they also added the theory of "Inflation", which meant because of inflation and how time works, that would require an infinite spawn of infinite parallel universes.
Eventually enough of them realized all of this is so unlikely to have happened by chance, that it is more likely for none of what we can see, hear, touch, smell or taste, to actually exist. We are just a perceiver projecting our own reality. I can't even list how many problems that creates, but as you will see in the 3rd video of "What you aren't being told about astronomy" videos, this is really the latest crock of imagination, the deniers of science have come up with. It's called a "Boltzmann brain" if you'd like to see for yourself.
This wandering "science" (which it so isn't) is being publicly accepted. As far as TV is concerned, they're just sticking with the billions of years thing and never able to successfully explain what would even support that. Unfortunately, we can't watch a documentary today without the video shoving millions of years of evolution at us.
Let's take a closer look at the origin of the theory itself, the beginning of the "Theory of evolution". I truly hope you can make it to the end of this section, as I have saved the best and most amazing information until the end. I will show you detailed and evidence packed seminars, by the most outstanding people to have ever approached the topic head on, and with full honesty. Like myself, many of these people did not start off with a churchy agenda. We just want the truth. Let the data speak for itself, instead of imposing your agenda to make the data support what you want.
Dr. Walt Brown, Dr. Kent Hovind,
Chuck Missler, Dr. Grady McMurtry,
Dr. Stephen Meyer, Mike Riddle
Those are the names of the men whom have done incredible amounts of research, and taken the time to present numerous fantastic videos for us. I encourage you to take a close look at what they are presenting, and see what else they have to share.
"Kent Hovind Wins Debate Against Bill Nye" 14:39
"Information Enigma: Where does
information come from?" 21:00
"The Fossil Record:Proof of Noah's Flood
or Evolution" 16:00
"Answers in Genesis - 4 Power Questions
for Evolutionists" 49:57
The full title to Charles Darwin's book:
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection,
or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for Life
This theory has been blasted wide open, as out right wrong, even in the eyes of agnostic sects. If you are of native African heritage, and have dark skin, just remember he thought of you as a intermediate species, slowing down the pack. I don't think even the most left winged celebrities can get on board with that statement.
If anyone actually reads "The Origin of Species", they likely would be shocked to learn that among Darwin's scientifically based proposals, was the elimination of "The negro and native Australian peoples", which he considered savage races, whose continued survival was hindering the progress of civilization.
In his next book, The Descent of Man (1871), Darwin ranked races in terms of what he believed was their nearness and likeness to gorillas. Then he went on to propose the extermination of races he "scientifically" defined as inferior. If this were not done, he claimed, those races with much higher birthrates than "superior" races, would exhaust the resources needed for the survival of better people, eventually dragging down all civilization. Now I'll agree, people are definitely becoming less intelligent, but that is another argument aside from genetics.
Past that, ask any geneticist about another wild species, outside of the empathetic human race, and even with the God made systems in place to ensure the strongest genes succeed, genetics and DNA are still getting worse, not better. "All things tend to disorder", and that is very easy to see for yourself.
Darwin argued that advanced societies should not waste time and money on caring for the mentally ill, or those with birth defects. To him, these unfit members of our species ought not to survive.
Aside from all those Hitler like perspectives, there are several foundational pillars that are required to be in firm place for the overall theory itself, to work. If any one of them collapsed, the entire theory can not stand. These foundational pillars have been utterly obliterated.
This can be easily understood with a basic grasp of cause and effect. Just take some time and have a look at the 17 arguments made here.
Top Ten Biological, and Chemical issues.
These following links are about what was said to be one of the earliest known "links" in the chain of evolution. It has what they called "Primitive biological systems" in the evolutionary chain. It was found as a fossil, and it was said to be 70 million years old. Well, It was first found in 1938 still living and still is today. It is completely unchanged. Do you understand what that means? "Evolution" as it was being sold. Never. Occurred. Look at the evidence yourself.
"Why Does The Bible Mention Unicorns" 8:09
This isn't remotely close to the only species found as an example to support creation and destroy evolutionary links either, there are many more, as you will see presented by Dr. Stephen Meyer.
Here is a list of other animals, that not only go against evolution, they prove creation.
This video is a bit off topic, but it should probably be addressed, as it is a favorite wild card amongst evolutionists to toss in, when the debate begins to turn against them. "What about where the Bible mentions Unicorns? Do you believe in unicorns?" The Bible clearly states Unicorn. Does it not?
If you're not ready for that, it can really unhinge you. With a quick visit to what it's talking about it is easy to see, that it was only referring to a species of rhinoceros. People today hear Unicorn and think of the mythical horse creature that can fly, not a single horned Rhinoceros . If you look up the latin or Hebrew translation, define and translate it, it is easy to see that it's the "Uni-horned Rhino". The following short video explains it all very well. I wasn't going to mention it, but you should be aware this is an "At the ready" wild card, waiting to be played in a tight spot.
Chronometers of the Universe
Though there are many "Time keepers" in the universe for us to observe, as seen in the prior links, we really only really need one for this point, but don't let this stop you, go find as many as you want.
(Here is a list of 101 more of them, if you'd like to check them out.)
Top 10 Evidences For a Young Earth
"5 Evidences The Earth Is
Less Than 10,000 Years Old" 8:17
The Lunar Laser Ranging experiment Apollo missions 11, 14, and 15, the crews left retroreflectors on the surface of the Moon. These are a series of small concave, half cube mirror reflectors, that always return a laser beam back to its origin, on principle of physics. Visit this link to learn more.
The entire purpose of this was to accurately (to the millimeter) observe the moon's orbit, and distance. After monitoring the Moon's orbit for 50 years now, they have learned it's traveling away from Earth at a rate of 3.8cm, or 1.5 inches a year. They admit that figure is "Anomalous", and it would be, if there weren't 100's if not 1000's of other examples that are also anomalous to the what they are trying to believe. I suppose an evolutionist would just ignore this, and move on...
For those of us with an open mind, and who are willing to read the cards as they lie, the obvious data makes perfect sense compared with everything else we find. The Earth is much younger then they teach. The math on this one is very easy to understand, and see why this refutes the belief of such an old Earth. Especially, when you consider the Moon is the major factor that raises and lowers the tides.
We can easily calculate how much the Moon's distance to Earth effects our tide to the foot by comparing the current highest possible tide, and the lowest possible tide for any given year. We use the closest the Moon gets to Earth in orbit, with the farthest it gets. Then we can add back the years at the rate of 1.5 inches a year, and see just how high the tides would have been. I have kept this calculation linear for simplicity, but it the real results are actually quadrupled. For even further accuracy, you would also need to factor in how much stronger the suns gravity would be if we added the mass back to it, of which it would have burnt up.
Highest perigee & perihelion tide
with the moon at a closest distance of
Lowest apogee & aphelion tide
with the moon at a farthest distance of
Difference of perigee and apogee
Range of tide
30,564 /9.2 = 3322.174
So about every 3,322.174ft =
1 foot in tidal height
The average moon travel
away from the Earth
is calculated to be
1.5 in per year
by NASA since 1969
1.5 x 100,000 years =
150,000in / 12 = 12,500ft
12,500 / 3322.174 = 3.76 ft
So every 100,000 years = 3.76 feet
1 million years = 37.6 feet high
2 million = 75.2ft
5 million = 188ft
10 million = 376ft
100 million years = 3,760 feet high
1 billion years = 37,600 feet high,
or 7 miles high.
However, the Moon would have crashed into the Earth long before that anyway, when it reached the Roche limit around 9,500km. If you don't know what a Roche limit is, it's when something gets too close in orbit to its host, that it breaks up and smashes into it.
Even at 1 million years, that frequent surge would have been a terrible thing. The 2010 tsunami of Japan was big at 128 feet, and just look what it did. Now let's consider the 10 million year mark. Even evolutionists have been backed into a corner to admit that the probability of evolution being a sound theory is impossible without at least a billion years. At 10 million years the tides would swing 376 feet which would devastate the planet. Just to throw another wrench in there, evolutionist say the Moon came from the Earth, which is spinning incredibly fast at 1000mph, and also on a 23.5 degree tilt, so due to the law of conservation of angular moment, the moon should also be spinning. However, as another wonder of God, we call a "Tidal lock", the same face of the moon is always looking back at us.
In addition to all this math done, it was done as if it was a linear effect, but its not. The tidal attraction to mass would be hyperbolic, just like 2 magnets as they get closer. The effect would actually be 4 times stronger with every bisection. This is due to the "Inverse square law", meaning all those figures are grossly understated. It would actually be much worse. Just go back to the math and "quadruple" each "Foot high" result, to get the real answer. Now, if you think to yourself "Perhaps the rate at which the moon is traveling away from Earth, is increasing in distance as time goes on?" The answer to that, is that it is incredibly consistent, but you are correct. It is true to say that it is not a constant. However, the variation is that it is actually decreasing its rate of separation in distance as time goes on, adding yet another layer to confirm a young Earth, and confound the evolutionist's agenda.
The more I study science, the more I believe in God.
~ Albert Einstein
Our Sun, is a running engine. It's mass is made out of it's own fuel. As she burns, it gets used, thereby it's mass decreases. This is all measurable from here. To say it remains unchanged, is really something unreasonable.
Gravity is extremely consistent, the matter of which the sun is comprised of is quite uniform, the fusion process, or burn rate is consistent, and it is located in a very stabile environment, (the vacuum of space). According to NASA, It rips through 600 million tons of hydrogen per second, and resets its "Solar cycle" every 11 years or so. Here are a couple of statements from their website.
''The Sun consumes about 600 million tons of hydrogen per second. (That's 6 x 10 to the 8th power, tons.) For comparison, the mass of the Earth is about 1.35 x 10 to the 21st power tons. This would mean the Sun consumes the mass of the Earth in about 70,000 years. ~Dr. Louis Barbier - (NASA)
"It is incorrect to say that the Sun is shrinking and it has been since the "creation" of the Universe. The Sun is not shrinking at a consistent rate. The data that were used to derive that were both wrong and misinterpreted. See the Skeptic Friends Network. Dr. Eric Christian
Go to the next link below this to find, and click on that "skeptic Friends" links. you have to see their response for yourself.
Then about the solar cycle he says this:
The periodicity of the 11 year solar cycle is complicated by the fact that there is no well-timed event that you can actually use as a basis for your periodicity. However, the Sun is much more regular than the "7 to 18 year range" that you mention. You can look at this image to see the best long term measure of solar activity (the sun spot number). There are modern observations that give a better measure of solar variability, but we've only got data for two or three cycles worth. The actual long term period is slightly more than 11 years and is remarkably stable. There are scientists who look at the statistics of solar activity and may have found other periodicities, but for the general public, there is effectively no difference between 10.8 and 11.7 years, especially given the broad and irregular temporal structure of both solar min and solar max.
Dr. Eric Christian (October 2003)
This is all on their website!
So NASA is saying, In a surprisingly consistent manner it burns up 600 million tons of hydrogen (which has mass, as matter does) per second, in an energy transfer from a gas through a fusion burning process, and converts and expels the matter into heat and light energy, thereby removing the matter it has, and it does this at a surprisingly constant rate, but isn't "shrinking" at a constant rate... Really? How many of Newton's laws does that break?
Let's say even if the pull of gravity on the surface and size of the sun, inverted anywhere close to the same rate at which it burnt the fuel, allowing for the diameter to expand as fuel burnt, so that it's diameter remained roughly the same, or even pulsated in size. Gravity would still decrease significantly, over the span of even 1 million years. GRAVITY, IS VERY IMPORTANT TO OUR ORBIT. Orbit is very important to our seasons and temperature. So is the the perfect balance of heat delivered, the ellipsis of the orbit, the 23.5 degree tilt of the earth which gives us seasons, the moon to provide the tides which fuel our oceans, and weather systems, to create the storms that shield the sun even more, and to provide the nitrogen and rain for our soil to feed the plants, which give off oxygen to allow the mammals to breathe and in return exhale the carbon dioxide which the plants need in return for the photosynthesis that could not happen if the sun were not mediated in so many specific ways and at just the right volume or they would all burn up.
WE ARE ONLY TALKING ABOUT THE GRAVITY PART! Not magnetic protection, chemical, or any of the other thousands and thousands of variables that need to be in place for us to survive. It could not work if just that one thing were changed, by only 1 million years at a constant burn rate of 600 Million tons per second.
The fact is, that it's being used up, and therefore it's features are decreasing, not remaining completely unchanged from an unlimited supply of energy from nowhere. At some point you have to admit that our very existence as we know it, to be happenstance from and explosion of NOTHING is absolutely absurd! The sooner you can admit this is ridiculous, the sooner you will realize the existence of a grand designer makes WAY more sense. The next step is making sure the Bible, out of all the other biblically spawned religious lies, is His one true operating manual left for us, and the rest really aren't. Good news is, that's actually easy to do.
That is up to each of us to decide, based on research, fueled by the guarantee that we will one day die, and since there is a designer of all this, what is the point of it? Faith was never meant to be blind.
Here is a bunch of work, data, and even charts complied found on the sun.
There is math all over the universe, with whatever calculations you want to perform to show that Newton's law of conservation is at work, you will find that energy does dissipate and it can be measured, and added against time. Doing this against millions of years will give you staggeringly large, and very impossible results to support these evolutionary theories to our existence, as we know it. This math shouts that creation is very young, and people are just trying to find a way to say it doesn't.
It is amazing that some who are accustomed to these fields still have the deliberate nerve to search for anything that disproves a creator, and can actually ignore the glaring data because they don't want God, or don't want to be ostracized by their peers. Evolution is indeed a religion, and it requires defiance, bullying, or a lack of understanding to just accept what is handed to you, and just as I say to anyone in a cult belief. THINK FOR YOURSELF, go crunch some numbers and search the nitty gritty, as well as the beginnings to these ideas. The beginning is always the uprooter. If it has no record or explanation for everyone prior to that start date how can it be the truth?
Some more unavoidable math.
A good way to make a point is to hyperbolize; to exaggerate the scenario, so as to better reveal the degree of its effects. This is done for us when it comes to studying the largeness of creation, with the expanse of space, or the smallest forms of life, with microbiology. In doing this we should eventually come to a point where we realize that, we couldn’t possibly explain how anything began. In that moment, you should drop your pride in thinking it’s just because we don’t understand. However, I feel it is safe to say, we will never make a galaxy, or even build a single celled organism into motion, even if we robbed Peter to pay Paul! We are not in charge, but nothing in this incomprehensibly large, or small and precise universe was a matter of chance, at all. So who is in charge and how do we know that?
The first step for the doubtful, is to drop the pride in thinking you can explain this away as a matter of chance, or that life is an accident and we mean nothing. There are glaring facts of things that exist that could not exist if the beginning was not long ago. The rate of decay is far too quick, for the features of any given body, but it makes no sense without trillions and trillions of years. Consider how every single explanation from evolutionists on how stars form, require other stars to already exist! A cosmic chicken and the egg scenario. Not to mention we have never seen a star form, they just point to gassy nebulas where we cant see inside of, and say it happens there of course. They have tried to sell the theory of “Dark matter” and “Dark energy”, but even that is too far of a stretch for mainstream astrophysicists to buy. These videos by Mike Psarris are the best videos I have ever seen produced. They're available for purchase in very high definition at:
How can we see stars so far away?
"Distant Starlight Vs. The Biblical Timeline.
(The Short Version)" 13:47
"(Undebunkable) Cosmic Microwave Background Proves Intelligent Design - but by whom?" 10:07
"What You Aren't Being Told About Astronomy
- Vol I (Our Created Solar system)" 1:50:59
"What You Aren't Being Told About Astronomy
- Vol II (Our Created Stars and Galaxies)" 1:03:05
"What You Aren't Being Told About Astronomy
- Vol III (Our Created Universe)" 1:47:39
"Distant Starlight: Does It Disprove Biblical Creation?
(The In-Depth Version)" 1:18:15
Evolutions Horizon Problem, According to an Evolutionist
"The horizon problem - why does the universe look the same in all directions" 2:37
The Global Flood and Mineralogy
Often used By evolutionists as a shining example of the timeline layers that the Colorado river has cut through over millions of years. Even if you walk around the canyon there are little brass placards in the sidewalk stating various "100's of millions of years" where you are standing. Lets think about this with topography in mind.
The Colorado originates in the Rocky Mountains and flows into the pacific. That is to say, from right to left in the picture shown. Please realize that according to their theory, that means the mighty Colorado river was mighty enough to flow up hill over a length of 270 miles, for thousands of vertical feet, through the mountain that is in the way, over millions of years to allow that to happen. You must realize the mountain was there before the river, otherwise the mountain would still be there! However, if water broke over the mountain and cut a river through it, now the would make more sense.
It is facts like this one, that make most creation speakers sound so snotty about it all. Try not to get mad when they get snippy, but it is very frustrating when you know this stuff is not being acknowledged and it's everywhere. It makes you wonder what in the world is going on around here? Why don't people see all of this, or say anything about it?! We will get into that in the next section, but for now I have saved the best for last.
Evidence for The Flood
The "Hydroplate Theory"
Doctors Kent Hovind, and Walt Brown have done more work on the topic, then is ever needed to irrefutably convince anybody that the "Evolution Theory" is a bad theory. The points made by these men are so sound and numerous, it will have you wondering how Charles Darwin ever got a foothold in the first place, but as they say you don't know, what you don't know. If you tell a lie long enough and loud enough people will believe it.
Dr. Walt Brown's
website where his incredibly detailed and very full book,
may be read online or bought.
Dr. Kent Hovind and Dr. Grady McMurtry
Both of these men have a series of youtube seminars on nearly every question you can think of, and then some. These videos give reference to sources, and are delivered section by section pain free to you. All you have to do, is watch them. However, getting someone to watch them with today's attention span and busyness is another battle. Below are the first videos of a series. These are so info packed, and I'd be truly amazed if you watch these to the end and still think this earth is millions of years old.
"The Kent Hovind Creation Seminar (1 of 7) :
The Age of The Earth" 1:55:56
"The Garden of Eden" (2 of 7)
"Dinosaurs and the Bible" (3 of 7)
"Lies In The Textbooks" (4 of 7)
"The Dangers of Evolution" (5 of 7)
"The Hydroplate Theory
The Flood (Newer Version)" 10:53
"25 Proofs Earth is Young - Dr. Grady McMurty
- 6000 Years Old?" 1:13:50
Dinosaurs and The Global Flood
"Does the Bible (Job 40) Describe
a Sauropod Dinosaur (Behemoth)?" 20:40
Uprooted and relocated, petrified trees
"Yellowstone Removes Misleading Petrified Tree Sign; Trees Grew Elsewhere" 3:29
Here is a significant problem for evolutionists. Carbon 14 has been found inside of diamonds. It isn't supposed to be inside of inorganic matter such as minerals that supposedly take millions of years to form. Carbon 14 is a radioactive isotope that has a half life of 5730 years, and as it degrades it turns into Nitrogen 14. As soon as something dies it stops making carbon 14, and from that point on it only decays and converts into Nitrogen 14. Hence the way they figure somethings age is by mathematically processing the ratio of nitrogen 14, to carbon 14.
I'm sure you are aware that diamonds are quite hard, they don't allow for anything organic to just seep in and impregnate the diamond. There are 3 major factors required for diamond formation; Carbon, pressure, and time. Since evolutionists use time to solve all their problems, they say diamonds take millions and millions of years to form. They don't believe such pressures, like that of "The flood", ever existed to form a diamond quickly. Even though there is a crazy amount of evidence to account for a global flood, and there is Carbon 14 inside of diamonds. We have since been able to create diamonds in minutes with the pressures technology as allowed us to achieve.
Diamonds a Creationist's best friend
Just like diamonds, opals have also been indistinguishably reproduced by an Australian Opal Miner who happens to be a believer in the Bible. Len Cram did not accept the current theory for opal growth. He believed it happened much faster and he tested, and even perfected his theory and was able to make opals in a matter of months.
Growing opals Australian style
There is a list posted called "RSR's List of Not So Old Things" on this list he goes into opals and many other very interesting death blows to the theory of evolution.
"The Precious Stones of Revelation 21" 5:49
As seen In the "History of the Writings" section, this is another amazing video that goes along with the, "impossible to be an accident", series of "Sevens" Ivan Panin found, or the meanings of each name in the lineage from Adam to Jesus, that tell the story of Jesus, over the huge span of time these names were given.
In Revelation 21, there is a list of gemstones used for the foundation in Heaven. At first mention, that list doesn't really seem to be hiding something amazing, unless you know what is special about these stones that have been chosen out of all of them. Only recently has our science reached an advanced enough level, giving us the ability to know what is special about these particular 12 stones.
Carbon dating! If there is anything more obnoxious to hear from an evolutionists, it's this, "But we know how old it is, because we've carbon dated it". If you're being serious with that statement, you're not using science because you're ignoring a major factor to suit the results you want. The measure of carbon in a thing is accurate, yes, but the amount of carbon in a thing is wildly inaccurate! There are so many unknown variables that add carbon to anything! That, is the very obvious truth. Look up what scientists dated the logs that got blown into the lake at Mt. St. Helens to, and we know exactly when that happened. Example after example of the glaring data is just being ignored!
The truth is that we do know the half life of various carbon, and we can accurately measure how much an object has, but we have absolutely know way of knowing how much carbon a thing should have, considering all of the possible outside influences that act upon any given objects carbon content. Not even close.
Flaws in time stamping
"Does Carbon Dating Go Beyond Biblical History?" 5:18
"Radiometric Dating Debunked In 3 Minutes." 3:05
"Ice Rings Are Not Annual Layers - Kent Hovind" 12:28
"Radiohalos: Evidence of Accelerated Radioactive Decay - Dr. Andrew Snelling" 1:02:59
Biological Coding and Mechanical functions
Take the time to think about the precise function and purpose in the grand design of any bit of creation. Whether it be the precision behind our solar system, photosynthesis, or the food chain, or any of the incredibly complex and precise mechanics at cellular levels. It is amazing to me that there are extremely intelligent people who are willing to say we just came about from a violent explosion from nothing, into the hostile environment of space, and all these insanely complex mechanics, (we still don't understand much of) all just came together by chance.
If it's not wanting to have God to answer to, then it's either the fear of being excommunicated by the proud mainstream, or because scientists see themselves as the ones who are paid to deliver a Godless explanation. They feel as though admitting we have been made by God, is a bit like admitting "magic", and that means they don't understand. They are therefore an inferior scientist who couldn't find an answer. However, the scientific data is all very much so there, and it's not doing their desires any favors. They have to deliberately ignore the scientific method to enforce their agenda.
People don't like the idea of being told what to do, even if it is for our own good. People like to think they can be their own God. Even though, it should occur to them, we will all die, and none of us know the way from there. Unless they're convinced death is the utmost end, and life has absolutely no purpose. I wish I could convince them all, they are more important then they think they are, and there is indeed a purpose.
This next fellow is special and rare, he was an evolutionist, who was an honest and brave scientist. As a scientist should do, he observed the data unbiasedly, and he let the data represent itself, instead of force fitting it into an established belief system.
"German Scientist, Günter Bechly,
Speaks Out About Intelligent Design" 6:03
"DNA - God's Amazing Programming, Evidence for His Existence" 4:24
"DNA Replication" 5:43
"Human Hearing System Explained" 3:20
"Bacterial Flagellum -
A Sheer Wonder of Intelligent Design" 7:37
"Your Body's Amazing Molecular Machines" 6:20
"Electron Transport Chain" 7:44
"Be Grateful for the Intelligent Design of Your Eyes" 9:20
Wonders of our Biological World
"Metamorphosis: The Beauty & Design of Butterflies" 4:22
"THIS IS A BUTTERFLY! (Scanning Electron Microscope) - Part 2 - Smarter Every Day 105" 9:18
"Monarch Butterflies: Great Migration" 4:36
"Amazing Process of Photosynthesis" 4:54
"Wonder of Water" 8:06
"Wonder of Light" 2:47
"Astronomy - Ch. 9.1: Earth's Atmosphere (6 of 61) Atmospheric Temperature Gradient" 7:49
This information is endless, so by all means, look for it, seek it out. It is no wonder God said, "Seek, and Ye shall find". It is all right there in front of us, and is being exposed more every year. Yet so many have their proud minds made up, but have no viable reason to present why. For what? Because it is taught in schools? Because they want to be meaningless? Remove your opinion for a moment and then look at the facts. Turns out you're actually important and loved, and there is a purpose to life! Isn't that fantastic news?! Darn right it is!
"Grady McMurtry's "Evolution No Evidence", Part 1 of 4" 14:48
How to get ETERNAL LIFE according to the Bible
Believe in your heart Jesus is The Lord, and that God raised him from the dead.
Declare it with your mouth, and you will be saved.
If you believe Jesus is your savior, be thankful! We're going home to place where 1 Corinthians 2:9 happens!
If you aren't quite sure Jesus is your savior, put your heart out on a limb. Nobody even needs to know you said it, God knows. It doesn't cost you anything, it is very easy, the reward is eternal life, and even if nothing happened, you are still in the same place you were before. The risk vs. reward here is an easy decision.
John 3: 12-21
If I have told you earthly things, and you believe not, how shall you believe, if I tell you of heavenly things? 13And no man has ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man who is in heaven. 14And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: 15That whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have eternal life. 16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18He that believes on him is not condemned: but he that believes not is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20For everyone that does evil hates the light, neither comes to the light, lest his deeds should be exposed. 21But he that does truth comes to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are worked in God.
Acts 11: 16-18
Then I remembered what the Lord had said: ‘John baptized with water, but you will be baptized with the Holy Spirit.’ 17So if God gave them the same gift he gave us who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I to think that I could stand in God’s way?” 18When they heard this, they had no further objections and praised God, saying, “So then, even to Gentiles God has granted repentance that leads to life.”
If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved.
For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.